Skip to content
51

iphone 17 pro max panzerglas privacy

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (15.9% search→purchase), but a deep review moat (71,345 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 55Growth 23Conversion 97Competition 18Returns 95Price range 55Avg price 60Brand share 34Review moat 0Quality gap 81

Conversion

Incredible15.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€13.17

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€399K

€399K/yr · 190K searches

Price range

Good€7.71–€23.92

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-4.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad78%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Review moat

Bad71,344.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products capture 78% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9

Sellers

19

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

9%

  • JETech38%
  • TORRAS17%
  • NEW'C14%
  • IMBZBK9%
  • MAGIC JOHN7%
  • UniqueMe6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€40K20%€80K30%€120K40%€159K1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 10 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 40 weeks — -4.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KBlack Friday '25Spike '26Oct '25Nov '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Super Qualität”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit14%

“Es ist easy anzubringen”

Gesamtgröße13%

“Nahtlose Passform”

Montage/Installation10%

“Easy Installation”

Fall/Aufprallschutz10%

“Ist gut Schütz mein Handy”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Funktion erfüllt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Preis/Leistung optimal”

Sicherheit3%

“Privacy”

Stärke1%

“Super stabile Folie”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung1%

“Funktioniert alles wie in der Anleitung”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit20%

“Folien splittern direkt”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Unzureichend”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Glas passt nicht richtig”

Gesamt anzeigen5%

“Löst sich vom Display”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“im Alltag unbrauchbar”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Schaut optisch halt nicht gut aus”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält leider nicht, was es verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Schade ums Geld”

Stärke4%

“Nicht so stabil”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Haftet nicht wie gewünscht am Handybildschirm”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße31%
Funktionalität insgesamt9%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt6%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%
Haltbarkeit6%
Gesamt anzeigen5%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Produktzustand3%