Skip to content
53

iphone 17 clear case

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.6%), but a deep review moat (26,198 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 52Growth 23Conversion 68Competition 72Returns 84Price range 73Avg price 75Brand share 27Review moat 13Quality gap 47

Returns

Great1.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€15.11

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€6.82–€37.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good42%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good6.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good€327K

€327K/yr · 350K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-3.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad26,198.41

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 42% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13

Sellers

39

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

9%

  • Spigen60%
  • JETech17%
  • TAURI5%
  • TORRAS4%
  • TOCOL3%
  • ivoler2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€10K6%€20K9%€29K12%€39K101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 34 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 36 weeks — -3.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KBlack Friday '25Spike '26Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße23%

“Passt”

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Qualitativ super”

Fall/Aufprallschutz10%

“Gute Hülle, schützt das Handy”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preis/Leistung optimal”

Stärke6%

“sehr robust”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Montage/Installation3%

“Superleichte Installation”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“handy”

Griff2%

“Bleibt sicher in der Hand”

Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption2%

“einen relativ starken Magneten.”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit15%

“Vergilbt nach wenigen Monaten”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Griff8%

“Ist sehr rutschig in in der Hand”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Absolut keine 12€ wert”

Dicke6%

“dünn”

Farbverblassen/Verfärbung5%

“Verfärbung Silikon”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passform nicht gut”

Touch-/Tastensteuerung4%

“Einzig an der Aussparung für den Action Button ist der Silikonrahmen recht dünn”

Farbe3%

“Plastik wird gelb”

Montage/Installation3%

“ich fand die Installation unnötig kompliziert im Vergleich zu anderen Produkten,”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße24%
Qualität insgesamt10%
Griff10%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt7%
Dünn5%
Materialqualität4%
Farbe4%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Magnetische Stärke/Adsorption3%