Skip to content
57

iphone 16 pro max panzerglas

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (19.4% search→purchase), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 95Growth 21Conversion 100Competition 35Returns 91Price range 77Avg price 55Brand share 24Review moat 0Quality gap 63

Conversion

Incredible19.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Incredible€2.3M

€2.3M/yr · 938K searches

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€5.48–€47.84

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€12.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-7.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad74,791.39

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

7%

  • NEW'C42%
  • JETech20%
  • TORRAS14%
  • TOCOL10%
  • ESR4%
  • OMOTON3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€114K10%€229K15%€343K20%€457K1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 92 weeks — -7.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
250K150KHoliday '24Black Friday '25NovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit13%

“Super easy”

Montage/Installation12%

“Leichte Installation”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Passt”

Fall/Aufprallschutz10%

“Super Schutz fürs Handy”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Unschlagbarer Preis”

Touch-/Tastensteuerung3%

“Das Touch funktioniert wie gewohnt”

Stärke3%

“Stabiles Material”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Hält was sie verspricht”

Gesamt anzeigen2%

“Das Glas sitzt exakt auf dem Display”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Null quali”

Haltbarkeit19%

“Haltbarkeit Flop”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Passt nicht wirklich perfekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Für 20€ inakzeptabel”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit4%

“Kleber löst sich an den Rändern”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Hält nicht,was es verspricht”

Gesamt anzeigen4%

“Display ist immer dreckig”

Montage/Installation3%

“Installation könnte aber einfacher sein”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%

“Unbrauchbar in Kombination mit FaceID”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Lügen. 2x2 Stück stimmt nicht, man bekommt nur 2”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße39%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit7%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt7%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Gesamt anzeigen5%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Haltbarkeit4%
Produktzustand2%