Skip to content
44

iphone 15 panzerglas sichtschutz

Skip it

A deep review moat (81,531 avg reviews) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 54Growth 17Conversion 100Competition 10Returns 97Price range 46Avg price 45Brand share 6Review moat 0Quality gap 70

Conversion

Incredible19.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€367K

€367K/yr · 165K searches

Price range

Okay€7.05–€21.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay€11.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-15.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad88%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad97%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Review moat

Bad81,530.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products capture 88% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

16

Top-5 brand share

97%

Open market

0%

  • NEW'C54%
  • JETech32%
  • TOCOL5%
  • MAGIC JOHN4%
  • TORRAS3%
  • IMBZBK3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€37K20%€73K30%€110K40%€147K1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 9 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -15.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Montage/Installation14%

“Installation war easy”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“Super Handhabung”

Gesamtgröße9%

“Passform stimmt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“hält was er verspricht”

Fall/Aufprallschutz8%

“Schützt das Handy optimal und ist einfach super”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Immer wieder gern halten super”

Stärke3%

“Stark und sicher”

Sicherheit3%

“Panzerglas privacy”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße26%

“Passt nicht”

Haltbarkeit15%

“Haltbarkeit nein”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Achtung: Schlechte Qualität”

Gesamt anzeigen6%

“Sie löst sich immer wieder von Display ab”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt5%

“Ungeeignet für Biometrie”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält nicht was die omnipräsente Werbung verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Verschwendetes Geld”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Face ID klappt nicht mehr”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Glas klebt nicht richtig”

Stärke3%

“Absolut nicht robust”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße54%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt8%
Gesamt anzeigen5%
Funktionalität insgesamt5%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit4%
Haltbarkeit4%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Produktzustand2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%