Skip to content
55

iphone 15 ladegerät

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but soft demand (-11.8% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 46Growth 19Conversion 76Competition 75Returns 97Price range 58Avg price 60Brand share 57Review moat 32Quality gap 33

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great7.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good40%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Good€13.24

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€7.62–€25.23

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay€250K

€250K/yr · 256K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,291.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-11.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 40% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

23 falling

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

25%

  • Anker20%
  • ipremium16%
  • ANVSI15%
  • Apple10%
  • Sunrson10%
  • ARCCRA5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€7K6%€15K9%€22K12%€30K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 42 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Aufladen45%

“Bester fast charge adapter”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Quality”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Produktbeschreibung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Plus: Preis/Leistung okay”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“handelt es sich um einen recht handlichen,”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker2%

“USB C plus Adaptern”

Portabilität2%

“Zum Trekking optimal”

Stärke2%

“robust”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt1%

“Funst auch beim Surface mit Windows 11”

What buyers complain about

Aufladen30%

“der Charger war defekt.”

Haltbarkeit20%

“Nach 1Monat defekt”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Heizung6%

“VERY HOT”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Super Teile”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert null”

Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker3%

“Stecker sofort verbogen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“11€ in den Müll”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert nicht mit Google Pixel10”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Irreführende Produktbeschreibung”

Top return reasons

Aufladen38%
Gesamtgröße13%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt11%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
Buchse/Anschluss/Stecker6%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Heizung3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Konnektivität – insgesamt2%