Skip to content
51

akku 1 5v aa wiederaufladbar

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but soft demand (-27.6% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 42Growth 11Conversion 57Competition 44Returns 96Price range 67Avg price 82Brand share 54Review moat 22Quality gap 72

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€17.74

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good€7.09–€31.14

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€217K

€217K/yr · 252K searches

Review moat

Bad9,452.27

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-27.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

87

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

23%

  • Dracutum38%
  • Zepath12%
  • PHOTOOLEX9%
  • iMuto9%
  • Homesuit4%
  • Energizer4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€11K10%€22K15%€32K20%€43K1101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -27.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Akkulaufzeit29%

“Beste AAA Lithium-Akkus”

Aufladen17%

“Super Akkuladegerät”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preis-Leistung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Works as expected”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Einfache handhabe”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Laufzeit”

Speicherkapazität2%

“Hohe Kapazität”

Stärke2%

“Leistungstark”

Gesamtgröße1%

“passt”

What buyers complain about

Akkulaufzeit33%

“Defekte Batterien”

Aufladen25%

“The charger ist defekt”

Haltbarkeit10%

“schlechte Haltbarkeit”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Schade in dieser Preisklasse”

Speicherkapazität2%

“Kapazitäten unzureichend”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“hält nichts”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Direkt defekt”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%

“Für Blink Kameras ungeeignet”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%

“Hält leider nicht, was es verspricht”

Top return reasons

Aufladen38%
Gesamtgröße16%
Akkulaufzeit13%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt6%
Funktionalität insgesamt6%
Batterieeinschluss3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%