Skip to content
40

philips luftbefeuchter filter

Skip it

Soft demand (-64.1% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 11Growth 0Conversion 90Competition 6Returns 95Price range 76Avg price 86Brand share 8Review moat 68Quality gap 65

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€19.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€11.15–€27.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good785

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad€44K

€44K/yr · 21K searches

Brand share

Bad97%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Bad93%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-64.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 93% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 rising

Sellers

37

Top-5 brand share

97%

Open market

0%

  • 1E39%
  • PHILIPS37%
  • AVAKKER8%
  • PARTSEE7%
  • DAODEFUL6%
  • vhbw3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€4K20%€9K30%€13K40%€18K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -64.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 30.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße43%

“Ok. Passt”

Filterung27%

“Filter”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Gutes Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Entspricht tatsächlich der Beschreibung”

Geruch3%

“Kein starker Eigengeruch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“der Preis wäre auch gut wenn nicht da nicht so viel zu meckern wäre.”

What buyers complain about

Kompatibilität – insgesamt25%

“Passen nicht für Luftbefeuchter Philips Serie 2000/ HU2716/10”

Gesamtgröße15%

“Passen nicht”

Dicke10%

“Viel dünner als Original”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Zerfallen nach kuzer Zeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Allerdings ist das Original auch doppelt so teuer”

Filterung5%

“Das schlimmste war das die Filter irgendwie ausdünsteten”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Minderwertiges Material, löst sich nach einiger Zeit im Wasserbad auf”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Schlechte Qualität”

Materialqualität5%

“Minderwertiges Material”

Verklemmen/Verstopfen2%

“Nach drei Tagen in Gebrauch fingen beide an sich an den Stößen zu zerlegen”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße51%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt18%
Filterung17%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Zertifizierungen1%
Dünn1%
Haltbarkeit1%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%