Skip to content
59

gasherd

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 37% of clicks), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 14Conversion 7Competition 93Returns 85Price range 12Avg price 59Brand share 95Review moat 86Quality gap 86

Brand share

Incredible37%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great271.34

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good€148.93

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€375K

€375K/yr · 484K searches

Growth

Bad-21.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad€22.00–€697.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

52 rising

Sellers

125

Top-5 brand share

37%

Open market

59%

  • Gasline10%
  • WEHIMO8%
  • Arebos7%
  • IsEasy6%
  • Amica6%
  • Beko5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€7K4%€15K6%€22K8%€30K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 93 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -21.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt24%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“preisleistung super!!!!!!”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Gute Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Hält, was er verspricht”

Backen5%

“Guter ofen”

Stärke4%

“Solide”

Grillen3%

“Das Beste am Anfang: Das Kochfeld funktioniert”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“leicht zu reinigen”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Design insgesamt2%

“Auch das Design sieht modern und elegant aus”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Müll”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Schnell defekt und Tisch angeschmort”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Der kostet noch einmal 20€”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hier sind also die Fotos irreführend”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Herd leider nicht nutzbar”

Heizung4%

“ungleichmäßige Hitzeverteilung”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Der Anschluss passt nicht”

Auslaufsicher4%

“Verliert Gas”

Entflammbar3%

“Flammen”

Montage/Installation3%

“Montageanleitung Verbesserungswürdig”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße26%
Funktionalität insgesamt16%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Qualität insgesamt7%
Entflammbar4%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Konnektivität – insgesamt3%
Auslaufsicher3%