Skip to content
51

zahnreinigung zwischenräume

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but soft demand (-16.5% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 29Growth 17Conversion 64Competition 59Returns 95Price range 82Avg price 74Brand share 49Review moat 21Quality gap 60

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€3.30–€73.11

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good€14.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay€131K

€131K/yr · 156K searches

Review moat

Bad11,829.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-16.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 falling

Sellers

63

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

21%

  • COSLUS25%
  • TePe20%
  • jjshund19%
  • GTEX6%
  • Vimmk4%
  • Qklovni4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€13K20%€26K30%€39K40%€52K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Mundhygiene23%

“Super Dental Besteck”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Excellente Produkte”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Preis-/Leistung super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Bestens anzuwenden”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“wie erhofft”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“Easy zu reinigen”

Gesamtgröße3%

“PASST”

Akkulaufzeit3%

“Akku top Leistung super”

Effizienz2%

“funktioniert”

Stärke2%

“Solides Gerät”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit17%

“Schlechte Haltbarkeit”

Mundhygiene10%

“Schlimmste Zahnseide”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Müll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Unpraktisch”

Aufladen5%

“Schade habe ich das Ladekabel irrtümlich entsorgt”

Gesamtgröße3%

“too big for me”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Etwas teuer”

Akkulaufzeit3%

“Akku Probleme”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“Sehr nasse Angelegenheit”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße15%
Funktionalität insgesamt14%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%
Stärke5%
Zahnempfindlichkeit4%
Mundhygiene3%
Aufladen3%
Auslaufsicher3%
Defekt Material/Teile3%