Skip to content
56

zahnprothesen reparaturset

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (3.5★), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 65Conversion 87Competition 0Returns 100Price range 79Avg price 82Brand share 0Review moat 38Quality gap 100

Quality gap

Incredible3.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€17.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€11.50–€28.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+43.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Good€275K

€275K/yr · 154K searches

Review moat

Okay2,743.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

2 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • DinaBase795%
  • Laboratoire Medident5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%20%€55K40%€110K60%€165K80%€220K1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 4 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 40 weeks — +43.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '26Oct '25Nov '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Haftung/Klebrigkeit50%

“Haftung sehr gut, Handhabung mäßig”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt17%

“Ware wie vom Hersteller beschreiben”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit17%

“Verwendung optimal”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis17%

“Schnell gut und günstig”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt30%

“Flop”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“Schade ums Geld”

Haltbarkeit13%

“hält überhaupt nicht”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit10%

“Haftgel hat nur mäßige Qualität”

Funktionalität insgesamt10%

“Hält nicht was versprochen wurde”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Nicht gut zu Handhaben”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Entspricht nicht der Beschreibung”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Die Tube ist sehr klein”

Top return reasons

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis28%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit22%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Gesamtgröße11%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Funktionalität insgesamt6%