Skip to content
56

zahnpasta

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 85Growth 24Conversion 93Competition 61Returns 100Price range 30Avg price 20Brand share 44Review moat 39Quality gap 25

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.4M

€1.4M/yr · 1.7M searches

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,556.91

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€0.81–€21.21

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-2.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Bad€7.24

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

113

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

17%

  • Odol-med 349%
  • Marvis10%
  • Oral-B9%
  • Colgate7%
  • Opalescence5%
  • ELMEX4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€71K10%€141K15%€212K20%€282K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 34 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -2.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Mundhygiene34%

“BESTE ZAHNKREME”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Super Produkt”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“guter nachgeschmack”

Zahnaufhellung7%

“Whitening Zahnpasta”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Bester preis”

Geschmack5%

“Super Geschmack”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Produkt entspricht der Beschreibung”

Zahnempfindlichkeit4%

“Beste Zahnpasta bei empfindlichen/schmerzhaften Zähne”

Reinigung3%

“Super zufrieden, Reinigungswirkung 1a, erfrischendes Gefühl, Preis Leistung ok”

Frische3%

“genau so fresh”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis21%

“Geldverschwendung”

Geschmack insgesamt8%

“Schmeckt nicht so gut”

Mundhygiene8%

“immer wieder Probleme mit Zahnfleischbluten,”

Geschmack6%

“Nicht geschmackslose”

Zahnempfindlichkeit5%

“Ein kleiner Hinweis: Für sehr schmerzempfindliche Zähne oder freiliegende Dentinkanälchen ist sie eher weniger geeignet”

Sichtweite3%

“Effekt noch nicht erkennbar”

Zahnaufhellung3%

“Kein Whitening-Effekt”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt2%

“Schmerzen”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Wenig Wirkung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Irreführendes Bild”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%
Mundhygiene10%
Funktionalität insgesamt10%
Geschmack insgesamt7%
Auslaufsicher7%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%
Feucht/Trocken5%
Sprachprobleme5%
Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%
Zahnaufhellung4%