Skip to content
56

waage

Worth a look

Shows a $6.5M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 99Growth 18Conversion 86Competition 38Returns 90Price range 73Avg price 82Brand share 40Review moat 1Quality gap 38

Market size

Incredible€6.5M

€6.5M/yr · 3.7M searches

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€17.97

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€9.47–€29.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-13.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad48,446.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

61

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

15%

  • RENPHO37%
  • runstar18%
  • Vitafit10%
  • Posture9%
  • Healthkeep8%
  • Soehnle5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€648K20%€1.3M30%€1.9M40%€2.6M1001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super, schnelle, quality”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Preis/Leistung Super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit13%

“Easy zu nutzen”

Design insgesamt8%

“Cooles Design”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Produkt ist wie es sein sollte”

Gesamt anzeigen6%

“großer Display,”

Konnektivität – insgesamt5%

“Top Waage mit super App-Anbindung”

Genauigkeit insgesamt3%

“Super genau”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Aber passt perfekt”

Effizienz3%

“Arbeitet mit der App genau”

What buyers complain about

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit17%

“Unzuverlässig”

Haltbarkeit15%

“Leider schnell defekt”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Qualitätsprobleme”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Wiegt definitv falsch”

Akkulaufzeit6%

“Batteriewechsel unmöglich”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“Hat erstmal nicht funktionieren”

Genauigkeit insgesamt5%

“Unzuverlässig”

Konnektivität – insgesamt4%

“Verbindungsprobleme”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Verkehrte Angabe”

Gesamt anzeigen2%

“Display-Symbole nahezu unleserlich”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt19%
Gesamtgröße18%
Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit14%
Konnektivität – insgesamt6%
Genauigkeit insgesamt5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Gesamt anzeigen4%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Gewicht schwer3%
Qualität insgesamt3%