Skip to content
65

viagra herren

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 85Growth 13Conversion 38Competition 65Returns 100Price range 79Avg price 95Brand share 44Review moat 79Quality gap 98

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Incredible€23.99

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Great€1.4M

€1.4M/yr · 1.9M searches

Review moat

Great428.15

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great€3.98–€60.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay3.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-23.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

47

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

16%

  • MEOHERBS30%
  • Men's Factory23%
  • Generisch10%
  • Saint Nutrition10%
  • Nirrel5%
  • Neradin5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (12 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€57K8%€114K12%€172K16%€229K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -23.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KSepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Good product”

Energieniveau10%

“Energie-Boost”

Fokusverbesserung8%

“Schon nach kurzer Zeit habe ich eine deutliche Verbesserung gemerkt mehr Ausdauer, stärkere Performance und vor allem ein riesiger Boost fürs Selbstbewusstsein”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Tabletten lassen sich easy einnehmen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Produkt macht was es soll”

Vitamin4%

“Vitaminen – alles in allem ein solides Produkt für Männer”

Dosierung4%

“Recht niedrig dosiert - am Preis gemessen recht teuer”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%

“Solide Männer-Formel”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Perfekt für Routine und Vitalität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Preis stimmt”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt34%

“Wirkung null”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“recht teuer”

Nebenwirkungen8%

“Minuswirkung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Das massive Marketing schafft Glaubwürdigkeit”

Dosierung4%

“Dosierungs-Dilemma”

Säureregulator/Linderung von Magenschmerzen3%

“Die Pillen sind nicht so gut 👎 mann bekommt dadurch Durchfall und Bauch schmerzen”

Hartes Gefühl3%

“wirkt richtig hart”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Müll”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Die Tabletten sind klein”

Haltbarkeit1%

“das bringt mir halt wenig.”

Top return reasons

Verdünnt/wässrig25%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt25%
Stärke25%
Funktionalität insgesamt25%