Skip to content
44

vendyle 2-in-1 damen körperrasierer

Skip it

Soft demand (-49.9% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 6Growth 0Conversion 53Competition 32Returns 62Price range 88Avg price 93Brand share 51Review moat 65Quality gap 95

Quality gap

Incredible4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€22.34

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€13.27–€33.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good884.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Good4.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad€25K

€25K/yr · 26K searches

Growth

Bad-49.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

22%

  • Brigin29%
  • forbany20%
  • RAXMETRY13%
  • Virelle9%
  • SWZEC4%
  • Beanify4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€2K20%€5K30%€7K40%€10K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 17 weeks — -49.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
800600Spike '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Good product”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit15%

“The different attachments are useful”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Super Preis/Leistung”

Akkulaufzeit8%

“the rechargeable battery lasts a good amount of time”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Tut was er soll”

Add-Ons/Anhänge5%

“The different attachments are useful”

Aufladen5%

“USB-C-Laden klangen praktisch. Leider”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“glatt, ohne ziepen”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Design insgesamt2%

“Das Design ist modern”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Unzufrieden”

Funktionalität insgesamt13%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Allergien10%

“Hatte danach übelste Irritationen”

Haltbarkeit9%

“Nach 3 Montaen Defekt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Leider überhaupt nicht wie angegeben”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Akku defekt, klinge unscharf nach Nutzung”

Add-Ons/Anhänge4%

“Sehr schlechte Qualität der Trimmer-Ausätze”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Totale Geldverschwendung”

schädigen/verbrennen Haare3%

“Meine Arme und Beine waren danach knall rot, haben gebrannt wie die Hölle und an Haaren kam trotzdem nix runter”

Aufladen3%

“Lädt kaum noch”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt37%
Qualität insgesamt12%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%
Defekt Material/Teile7%
Add-Ons/Anhänge6%
Stärke4%
Gesamtgröße4%
schädigen/verbrennen Haare3%
Aufladen3%
Produktzustand2%