Skip to content
65

vaya creatin und taurin

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 79Conversion 29Competition 87Returns 100Price range 86Avg price 82Brand share 87Review moat 46Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Great€6.70–€83.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€17.97

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Great+70.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay1,861.07

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay2.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€75K

€75K/yr · 182K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

31 rising

Sellers

55

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

46%

  • GEN GERMAN ELITE NUTRITION15%
  • ProFuel10%
  • XbyX8%
  • NUTRAGENICS8%
  • Gym Nutrition6%
  • EVOLITE NUTRITION6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€2K6%€4K9%€7K12%€9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)4 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 46 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 14 weeks — +70.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Positives:”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Preis-/Leistung Beste”

Löslichkeit11%

“Super Löslichkeit”

Geschmack6%

“Geschmack neutral”

Geschmack insgesamt6%

“Mega lecker”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Macht seinen Job”

Ernährungs Gehalt4%

“Best erforschtes Supplement”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Top Produkt”

Energieniveau3%

“I feel more energetic”

Dosierung3%

“Bequem statt 3 Dosen -”

What buyers complain about

Geruch9%

“Stinkt”

Löslichkeit8%

“Löslichkeit”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“Es hat allerdings einen bitteren Nachgeschmack”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Irreführend”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“nicht ganz optimal”

Dosierung4%

“Dosierlöffel fehlt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Money for nothing”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Sehr gross”

Geschmack4%

“Geschmacklich nicht ganz neutral”

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken3%

“Form schlecht schluckbar”

Top return reasons

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis25%
Geschmack insgesamt25%
Funktionalität insgesamt17%
Zertifizierungen17%
Geschmack8%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%