Skip to content
56

vape ohne nikotin

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 5Growth 19Conversion 7Competition 80Returns 99Price range 80Avg price 79Brand share 74Review moat 86Quality gap 98

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great284.07

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great35%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great€5.09–€57.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€16.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good60%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-11.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€20K

€20K/yr · 228K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (35% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

35 rising

Sellers

83

Top-5 brand share

60%

Open market

36%

  • ELF Bar35%
  • Lifeofvape9%
  • oxsan9%
  • CARITATE4%
  • MONVAP4%
  • Rbleote4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€5956%€1K9%€2K12%€2K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 60 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSpike '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“fairer Preis”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Sehr elegant Qualität super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit13%

“einfache Handhabung”

Akkulaufzeit8%

“Super Akku - hält lange”

Geschmack7%

“Super Geschmack”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt”

Geruch4%

“Aroma”

Geschmack insgesamt3%

“Schmeckt”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Null Qualität”

Aufladen12%

“Längeres laden hilft auch nicht”

Funktionalität insgesamt9%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Geldverschwendung”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Nach 2 Tagen defekt”

Auslaufsicher5%

“Verlieren liquid nach wenig Zeit”

Akkulaufzeit5%

“Pod System, Akku hält 2 Tage”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Gerät ist defekt”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Kleben überhaupt nicht”

Geruch3%

“Riecht stark, schmeckt nach nix, Widerstand nicht gut”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt29%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Aufladen8%
Gesamtgröße7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Auslaufsicher4%
Haltbarkeit4%
Akkulaufzeit4%
Geruch3%