Skip to content
58

toilettenpapier 5 lagig

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 98Growth 21Conversion 97Competition 38Returns 99Price range 64Avg price 74Brand share 26Review moat 24Quality gap 45

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible€6.2M

€6.2M/yr · 2.7M searches

Conversion

Incredible15.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good€14.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€2.23–€37.95

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad5,248.81

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-8.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

47

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • by Amazon66%
  • Regina8%
  • Hakle8%
  • Zewa5%
  • MyPapp2%
  • PACKEO2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€618K20%€1.2M30%€1.9M40%€2.5M101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -8.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
80K60KPrime Day '24Spike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 15.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt22%

“Super Produkt”

Weiches Gefühl21%

“als „Ultra Soft“ Hervorragendes Schmirgelpapier!”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Beste Toilettenpapier Preis super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Hält, was es verspricht”

Komfort insgesamt6%

“insgesamt ein sehr komfortables,”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Fazit: Angenehm weich, zuverlässig und für die gewöhnliche Anwendung bestens geeignet”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Umweltfreundlichkeit2%

“es ist Recyclingmaterial- top”

Dicke2%

“Ansicht recht dick”

Stärke2%

“robust und sinnvoll”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Qualität hat sich merklich verschlechtert”

Dicke16%

“Sehr dünn und fusselt”

Gesamtgröße13%

“Blätter sind schmaler und kürzer”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Weniger Blätter höherer preis”

Hartes Gefühl5%

“NICHT so wie Softis”

Stärke3%

“trotzdem sehr dünn”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Krasse Falschinformation in der Produktbeschreibung”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Ja. Toilettenpapier halt”

Geruch2%

“GERUCHSLOS”

Komfort insgesamt1%

“Es ist nichts Besonderes oder super luxuriös”

Top return reasons

Qualität insgesamt28%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%
Dünn9%
Gesamtgröße8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%
Feucht/Trocken4%
Hartes Gefühl3%
Weiches Gefühl3%
Geruch2%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%