Skip to content
62

steinreiniger

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 52Growth 73Conversion 52Competition 29Returns 100Price range 82Avg price 95Brand share 38Review moat 59Quality gap 78

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€28.09

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€4.97–€68.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+56.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good1,143.68

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€331K

€331K/yr · 277K searches

Conversion

Good4.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

56

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

13%

  • ABACUS32%
  • Terra Domi24%
  • Mellerud13%
  • VEXIL8%
  • KÄRCHER6%
  • Nanoprotect5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€33K20%€66K30%€99K40%€132K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +56.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 11.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Einfache Reinigung30%

“Terrasse reinigen”

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%

“Das Ergebnis wie auf dem Foto”

Effizienz8%

“Wirksamkeit”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Super einfach”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Super Produkt und Preis”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%

“Genau nach Verarbeitungsanweisung des Herstellers, funktioniert”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung2%

“Sehr wirksames Mittel zur Beseitigung von Unkraut”

Produktzustand1%

“sie ist wieder fast wie neu”

Geruch1%

“Hilft gut nach 12 Stunden Wirkung stinkt aber leider”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis23%

“Waste of money”

Funktionalität insgesamt22%

“Didn't work at alllllllll”

Einfache Reinigung17%

“Fugen werden kaum sauberer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Irreführend”

Fleckenbeständigkeit4%

“Flecken”

Geruch3%

“stinkt sehr nach Chemie”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“sehr schlecht”

Pflanzenwachstum1%

“Bisher kein Gras nachgewachsen”

Haltbarkeit1%

“hält auch nicht allzu lange an”

Farbe1%

“statt weiß in braun.”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt34%
Auslaufsicher13%
Gesamtgröße9%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt9%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Umweltfreundlichkeit4%
Einfache Reinigung4%
Geruch3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Defekt Material/Teile3%