Skip to content
64

silberfische bekämpfen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 84Growth 23Conversion 85Competition 44Returns 98Price range 34Avg price 56Brand share 55Review moat 72Quality gap 96

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Great9.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.4M

€1.4M/yr · 1.1M searches

Review moat

Good630.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good€12.76

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay€3.17–€21.17

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-3.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

42

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

25%

  • Catchmaster22%
  • Patronus22%
  • Gerobug15%
  • Aeroxon10%
  • ARDAP3%
  • Envira3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€68K10%€137K15%€205K20%€274K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit11%

“Handhabung ok”

Sprühen/Durchfluss11%

“Super Spray”

Effizienz11%

“Funktioniert”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“hält, was es verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Super Produkt”

Geruch8%

“Der Geruch ist recht neutral”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung6%

“Silberfischchen reduziert”

Stärke4%

“Hoch wirksam”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Für mich war das Produkt jeden Cent wert”

Montage/Installation4%

“Aufbau und Installation verlief ohne Probleme”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt36%

“Keine spürbare Wirkung”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung14%

“Insekten”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“War ein teurer Flop”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit8%

“Kleber vollkommen unbrauchbar”

Geruch5%

“um nicht zu sagen es stinkt”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Seit 2 Wochen sind die Fallen aufgestellt aber bisher sind die Fallen leer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Müll”

Kontamination2%

“Am nächsten Morgen lagen 18 tote Silberfische überall rum”

Stärke1%

“Nicht sehr wirksm”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt50%
Gesamtgröße7%
Auslaufsicher6%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Geruch4%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%