Skip to content
57

silberbad für silberschmuck

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 51Growth 29Conversion 85Competition 51Returns 95Price range 71Avg price 59Brand share 54Review moat 31Quality gap 58

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good€4.11–€41.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good€13.10

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good€290K

€290K/yr · 235K searches

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay3,386

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+3.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

95

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

24%

  • Hagerty27%
  • PANDORA16%
  • SILUX13%
  • Poliboy ... pflegt wie neu12%
  • Connoisseurs5%
  • Maximex4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€15K10%€29K15%€44K20%€58K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 28 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +3.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Einfache Reinigung29%

“EASY & CLEAN”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit13%

“Easy in der Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Hält was er verspricht”

Effizienz5%

“Funktioniert”

Helligkeit/Glanz/Glühen5%

“Blitzblank”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preis Leistung super”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Design insgesamt2%

“Super Design, sehr verständliche Anleitung”

Haltbarkeit1%

“hält was es verspricht, immer wieder”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit16%

“Nach 10 Monaten defekt”

Einfache Reinigung15%

“Reinigungsleistung quasi NULL”

Gesamtgröße9%

“für manche Brillen eine Spur zu klein.”

Funktionalität insgesamt8%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Teuer”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Durchschnittliche Bewertung,”

Geruch3%

“Defekt mit Schmorgeruch”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Der Artikel ist defekt”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“zu trocken”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Die mitgelieferte Wanne für Schmuck entspricht nicht der Produktbeschreibung”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße29%
Funktionalität insgesamt26%
Einfache Reinigung12%
Defekt Material/Teile7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Haltbarkeit3%
Produktzustand2%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%