Skip to content
64

shaker edelstahl

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 66Growth 52Conversion 43Competition 59Returns 98Price range 48Avg price 70Brand share 63Review moat 54Quality gap 84

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€14.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€650K

€650K/yr · 1.3M searches

Brand share

Good67%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Good1,338.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+22.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Okay€3.88–€25.14

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Okay3.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

45

Top-5 brand share

67%

Open market

28%

  • ESN38%
  • Promixx9%
  • VETAIN9%
  • ShakeNext6%
  • ABOVE.5%
  • GymBeam5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€65K20%€130K30%€195K40%€260K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +22.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt27%

“Super Produkt”

Einfache Reinigung8%

“super zum Reinigen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Beste Investition”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Easy Shaker”

Stärke4%

“robust”

Temperaturerhaltung4%

“Getränke bleiben warm oder kalt”

Auslaufsicher3%

“Schöner Auslauf sicherer Shaker”

Design insgesamt3%

“modernes sportliches Design”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

What buyers complain about

Auslaufsicher34%

“Shaker Undicht”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“- billige Produktion”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Schlechte Haltbarkeit”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“Erste Reinigung völlig problemios”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Günstiger Preis, dafür undichter Shaker”

Geruch3%

“Stinkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Unpraktisch”

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit2%

“Mess-Skala nicht zu gebrauchen”

Wasserbeständigkeit1%

“Läuft bei Wasser aus”

Funktionalität insgesamt1%

“Schlechter shaker”

Top return reasons

Auslaufsicher28%
Gesamtgröße10%
Funktionalität insgesamt7%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Farbe4%
Haltbarkeit3%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Gewicht schwer3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%