Skip to content
50

seitan

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but soft demand (-26.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 41Growth 12Conversion 78Competition 26Returns 100Price range 77Avg price 90Brand share 22Review moat 82Quality gap 53

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€20.95

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great359.23

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Great7.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€3.64–€52.79

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay€211K

€211K/yr · 129K searches

Competition

Okay70%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-26.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 70% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

7 falling

Sellers

9

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

4%

  • Green Essence57%
  • KoRo12%
  • Vantastic Foods10%
  • GOLDEN PEANUT6%
  • Ostmann5%
  • SID5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€21K20%€42K30%€63K40%€84K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -26.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt41%

“Super ware”

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Geschmacklich gut”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“günstig”

Würzigkeit5%

“Einfach Spitze”

Backen5%

“Schone Produkt,backen mit im sehr schone Brötchen”

Geschmack5%

“Guter Geschmack und günstiger Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Zweck erfüllt”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Lässt sich super verarbeiten”

Haltbarkeit3%

“seit Jahren in Gebrauch”

What buyers complain about

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt14%

“Konsistenz und Verarbeitung nicht so gut”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“teuer”

Geschmack12%

“Neuraler Geschmack”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“Schmeckt leider nicht”

Sauer7%

“schon beim auspacken sauer geworden”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“die Bewertung bezieht sich auch ausdrücklich darauf, nicht auf die Produktqualität.”

Knusprigkeit3%

“Einziges Manko: Es wurde ein klitzekleines bisschen krisselig, wobei das auch am verwendeten Tofu liegen könnte”