Skip to content
51

second skin tattoo

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (16.1% search→purchase), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 78% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 56Conversion 98Competition 18Returns 97Price range 55Avg price 36Brand share 34Review moat 72Quality gap 60

Conversion

Incredible16.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Good616.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+29.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Good€5.10–€26.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay€10.36

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€77K

€77K/yr · 46K searches

Competition

Bad78%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 78% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

12 falling

Sellers

15

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

10%

  • Rayyl19%
  • PEPAX17%
  • Emalla17%
  • FORETOGO16%
  • Monsters Ink15%
  • TONBAO5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€4K10%€8K15%€12K20%€15K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +29.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Haltbarkeit18%

“Hält perfekt”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit14%

“Kleben super”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Sehr gutes Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“hält was sie verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“preis-leistung super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Allergien6%

“keinerlei Reizungen oder Allergien aus”

Schutz4%

“Idealer Schutz vor Staub und Schmutz”

Wasserbeständigkeit4%

“Wasserfest”

Feucht/Trocken2%

“Bleibt trocken”

What buyers complain about

Haftung/Klebrigkeit25%

“Null klebekraft”

Allergien12%

“Hautverletzend”

Wasserbeständigkeit11%

“Nicht Wasserfest”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Müll”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Hält nicht”

Stärke4%

“Hält nicht so wie es soll”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Ist nicht so wie beschrieben”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Dafür ist mir das Geld zu schade”

Hautgesundheit4%

“Nach mehrfachen benutzen ist mir die Haut abgegangen”

Lackqualität4%

“nimmt Farbe mit”

Top return reasons

Haftung/Klebrigkeit35%
Gesamtgröße24%
Funktionalität insgesamt14%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Wasserbeständigkeit4%
Dünn3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis1%
Feucht/Trocken1%
Einfache Anwendung1%
Entflammbar1%