Skip to content
48

schrundensalbe füße

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 97% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 39Growth 48Conversion 89Competition 32Returns 100Price range 59Avg price 34Brand share 6Review moat 39Quality gap 42

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good€3.28–€32.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+18.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay€197K

€197K/yr · 187K searches

Review moat

Okay2,563.94

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay€10.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad97%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

60

Top-5 brand share

97%

Open market

0%

  • Dr. Scholl's70%
  • Gehwol12%
  • Neutrogena7%
  • Fußpunkt5%
  • tetesept3%
  • Kneipp3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€20K20%€39K30%€59K40%€79K1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +18.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Komfort insgesamt14%

“Super comfortable und schnell zugeschnitten im Schuh verbaut”

Weiches Gefühl12%

“Fühlt sich gut an”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“super in der Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“wie gesagt: das Marketing-Bla ist dasselbe,”

Feucht/Trocken5%

“Pflegt sehr gut trockene”

Effizienz5%

“Effektiv”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Geruch3%

“Hilft auch gegen Fußgeruch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Preis Leistung OK”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt11%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Flop”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“total überteuert”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Nach 5 Minuten Einsatz defekt”

Produktzustand4%

“Anscheinend wurde die Creme schon benutzt”

Stärke4%

“Wenig Kraft”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Völlig unbrauchbar”

Abgabemechanismus3%

“Der Spender war defekt”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“Fast so trocken wie meine Fersen”

Hautgesundheit3%

“hilft nicht gegen Schrunden”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt28%
Auslaufsicher11%
Blutzuckerspiegel6%
Kratzfestigkeit6%
Haltbarkeit6%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt6%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%
Gesamtgröße6%
Alterseignung6%
Saugen6%