Skip to content
52

schmutzradierer

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (17.7% search→purchase), but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($1.85–$14.52) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 67Growth 26Conversion 99Competition 31Returns 99Price range 0Avg price 22Brand share 43Review moat 44Quality gap 63

Conversion

Incredible17.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good€670K

€670K/yr · 476K searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,145.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+0.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Bad€7.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad€1.85–€14.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 rising

Sellers

34

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

14%

  • TIEFENREIN24%
  • MR.SIGA16%
  • BROX15%
  • Milepex14%
  • Meister Proper10%
  • HELDENWERK6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€27K8%€54K12%€80K16%€107K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +0.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Einfache Reinigung24%

“Meister Proper Schmutzradierer”

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Super Produkt”

Effizienz9%

“Funktioniert”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“dafür günstig”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“ultraleichte Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Scheinen langlebig”

Stärke2%

“Stark, sehr zu empfehlen”

Fleckenbeständigkeit1%

“alle flecken auch von Wildlederschuhen weg”

Design insgesamt1%

“Das Design wirkt modern, hochwertig und professionell”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit18%

“Abnutzung”

Einfache Reinigung12%

“Es zerfällt bei der Reinigung”

Funktionalität insgesamt12%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Fleckenbeständigkeit9%

“Er entfernt keinerlei Flecken”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Schlechte Qualität”

Lackqualität4%

“Unbekannte Flecken auf gestrichenen Tapete”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Unbrauchbar”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“Zu weich”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Teurer nicht unbedingt besser”

De-Grease2%

“Fett- Ölflecken einfach weg Rasieren”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt41%
Qualität insgesamt10%
Haltbarkeit9%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Fleckenbeständigkeit5%
Gesamtgröße4%
Reinigungsmodi4%
Einfache Reinigung3%
Nassreinigung3%