Skip to content
60

sahnepulver

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 63Growth 74Conversion 60Competition 15Returns 100Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 15Review moat 73Quality gap 72

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€27.19

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€10.62–€69.01

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+57.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good594

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€579K

€579K/yr · 412K searches

Conversion

Good5.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Bad82%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 82% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 rising

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

3%

  • MORE NUTRITION49%
  • IronMaxx23%
  • Body Attack13%
  • Vit4ever6%
  • MaxiNutrition3%
  • Inlead3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 3%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€58K20%€116K30%€174K40%€231K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 27 weeks — +57.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '26Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt21%

“Schmeckt”

Ernährungs Gehalt15%

“Super Protein”

Geschmack12%

“Chunky Flavor”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Produkt super”

Süße6%

“Super altanative zum süßen”

Backen5%

“Auch beim Backen klappt es prima – Kuchen oder Muffins werden locker”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt4%

“Konsistenz ist auch super”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Löslichkeit4%

“Gute Löslichkeit”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Sehr einfach zu benutzen”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt20%

“Schmeckt absolut ekelhaft”

Geschmack13%

“More Chunky flavour”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Nachfüllpack teurer”

Ernährungs Gehalt5%

“Ekliger Protein Schlamm oder kotze”

Künstliche Süßstoffe3%

“Beigeschmack nach Süßungsmitteln”

Süße3%

“Leider unglaublich süß”

Heizung2%

“mischen dann wird es auch nicht kluppig ( nur erwärmen nicht erhitzen)”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Haltbarkeit lächerlich”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt1%

“ich mag die Konsistenz nach dem aufschlagen nicht. Fühlt sich im Mund sehr breiig an.”

Verdünnt/wässrig1%

“Einfach komplett ungenießbar”

Top return reasons

Ernährungs Gehalt22%
Geschmack insgesamt13%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%
Vegan/Biologisch4%
Süße4%
Gewichtsverlust4%
Sauer4%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Salzgehalt4%