Skip to content
59

rasierstein

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 2Growth 78Conversion 81Competition 33Returns 97Price range 64Avg price 36Brand share 56Review moat 72Quality gap 96

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Great8.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Great+67.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good605.86

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€4.32–€33.84

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay€10.27

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad€10K

€10K/yr · 11K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

24%

  • Störtebekker Shaving Accessories27%
  • FVION25%
  • COMAIR GERMANY7%
  • Purezing6%
  • BEZOX6%
  • Delmara5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€96520%€2K30%€3K40%€4K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +67.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
500300Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt22%

“Funktioniert”

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Super Produkt,”

Weiches Gefühl12%

“Macht glatt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Einfache Handhabe”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis/Leistung ok”

Effizienz6%

“Sehr effizient”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Liegt gut in der Hand”

Blutdruck2%

“Natürlich und hilfreich bei Blutungen”

Allergien2%

“reizt die Haut nicht”

Griff2%

“liegt toll in der Hand,”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt17%

“Funktioniert überhaupt nicht”

Haltbarkeit12%

“Direkt gebrochen”

Allergien9%

“führt zu Hautirritationen”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Müll”

Hautgesundheit6%

“Reizt die Haut”

Defekt Material/Teile6%

“Der gelieferte Stift war gebrochen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Eher unhandlich”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Deutlich kleiner als erwartet”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Überteuerter Müll”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt36%
Defekt Material/Teile18%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Gesamtgröße4%
Produktzustand4%
Haltbarkeit3%
schädigen/verbrennen Haare2%
Qualität insgesamt2%