Skip to content
52

rasierpickel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 92% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 23Growth 47Conversion 89Competition 50Returns 100Price range 23Avg price 48Brand share 21Review moat 71Quality gap 62

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good679.46

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Okay€11.74

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+17.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€91K

€91K/yr · 73K searches

Price range

Bad€6.10–€17.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Bad92%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

56

Top-5 brand share

92%

Open market

6%

  • Sagella73%
  • Meda Pharma8%
  • Veet5%
  • Australian Bodycare3%
  • womn3%
  • Saugella2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€5K10%€9K15%€14K20%€18K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +17.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch16%

“Angenehmer Duft”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

Weiches Gefühl6%

“Angenehmes Hautgefühl”

Komfort insgesamt5%

“angenehm auf der Haut”

Empfindlichkeit insgesamt4%

“Für sensitive und sensible Haut geeignet”

Eignung für Mischhaut4%

“Angenehm auf der Haut”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Hautgesundheit3%

“Auch die Regeneration der Haut wird durch darin enthaltenen Kräuter unterstützt”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“unbedingt benutzen”

What buyers complain about

Geruch15%

“Riecht nicht so gut”

Allergien12%

“Juckreiz”

Funktionalität insgesamt9%

“Hilft gar nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Zu teuer”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt8%

“Veränderte Rezeptur :( Warum wurde die Rezeptur geändert?”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt7%

“Konsistenz: wässrig statt zähflüssig”

Nebenwirkungen6%

“das Produkt erzeugt ein extremes Brennen!.”

Linderung von Juckreiz3%

“Brennen und Juckreiz, sowie extreme Trockenheit dadurch bekommen”

Abdeckung3%

“Es verdeckt alles, samt Anwendung und sieht einfach nicht schön aus”

Schaum2%

“Sie schäumt nicht”

Top return reasons

Auslaufsicher36%
Geruch21%
Funktionalität insgesamt18%
Entflammbar9%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Farbe3%
Schaum3%