Skip to content
56

ph teststreifen scheide

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 21Growth 13Conversion 88Competition 25Returns 99Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 49Review moat 97Quality gap 97

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Incredible52.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Incredible€24.07

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great10.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€5.98–€79.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad70%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad€85K

€85K/yr · 34K searches

Growth

Bad-23.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 70% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

13 flat

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

18%

  • getTested26%
  • Labssy24%
  • Cyclotest13%
  • HORNY HIVE7%
  • LuxmedIQ6%
  • VIOLA6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€9K20%€17K30%€26K40%€34K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 83 weeks — -23.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Holiday '24Spike '25DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Aug, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit50%

“Leicht zu handhaben, aussagekräftig”

Genauigkeit insgesamt17%

“Guter Test”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung8%

“Gute Anleitung, Ergebnis schnell”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Gute Qualität”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Gut und verlässlich”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Die Test funktionieren wie beschrieben”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt46%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit8%

“2 Streifen schwach im Lesegerät zu sehen gewesen sind, heißt, C und 1. Ergebnis nicht nachvollziehbar!.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Unbrauchbar”

Genauigkeit insgesamt8%

“Schlechter test”

Entzündung8%

“Selber Entzündung messen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“teuer”

Farbe7%

“die Farbe ist nicht immer so eindeutig”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt38%
Farbverblassen/Verfärbung13%
Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung8%
Feucht/Trocken8%
Farbe8%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%
Haltbarkeit8%
Zertifizierungen8%