Skip to content
44

pflasterbox

Skip it

A small market ($53K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 13Growth 23Conversion 61Competition 32Returns 100Price range 69Avg price 61Brand share 44Review moat 58Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Good€2.42–€42.53

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good€13.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,163.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-3.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€53K

€53K/yr · 75K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

132

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

16%

  • W. Söhngen GmbH33%
  • Cederroth15%
  • Beiersdorf14%
  • First Aid Only10%
  • Söhngen7%
  • Hansaplast5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€5K20%€11K30%€16K40%€21K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 15.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Erfüllt sein Zweck”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit11%

“Pflaster klebt super”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis Leistung optimal”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Praktisches Täschchen”

Gesamtgröße7%

“PASST”

Desinfektion4%

“Desinfektionsspray”

Portabilität4%

“Ideal für Reisen”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Super beständig”

Sprühen/Durchfluss3%

“Das Spray lässt sich einfach anwenden”

What buyers complain about

Haftung/Klebrigkeit11%

“Könnte etwas besser haften”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Fragliche Anwendung”

Funktionalität insgesamt8%

“Funktioniert nicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“das Produkt entspricht in der praktischen Nutzung leider nicht wirklich dem, was in der Beschreibung angegeben wird.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Teuer”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Teurer Müll”

Wasserbeständigkeit6%

“Nicht wasserdicht”

Desinfektion4%

“keine echte Desinfektion”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Leider keine Haltbarkeit”

Kontamination4%

“Unhygienisch und nicht brauchbar”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße81%
Gewicht schwer8%
Funktionalität insgesamt8%
Desinfektion4%