Skip to content
40

pflaster sensitiv

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 49Growth 25Conversion 98Competition 22Returns 100Price range 4Avg price 19Brand share 0Review moat 36Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible17.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay€267K

€267K/yr · 226K searches

Review moat

Okay2,860.29

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-0.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Avg price

Bad€6.73

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad€2.01–€15.61

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

74

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Hansaplast63%
  • Saxomed15%
  • Beiersdorf14%
  • ABENA4%
  • Medrull4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€27K20%€53K30%€80K40%€107K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -0.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Beste Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Super Preise”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit13%

“haftet super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“hält, was es verspricht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Leichte Handhabung”

Gesamtgröße6%

“PASST”

Desinfektion3%

“Desinfektionsspray”

Haltbarkeit3%

“hält gut,”

Sprühen/Durchfluss2%

“Das Spray lässt sich einfach anwenden”

Effizienz2%

“Hat alles reibungslos geklappt”

What buyers complain about

Haftung/Klebrigkeit36%

“Klebekraft ist gleich Null”

Allergien12%

“Haut gerötet/gereizt”

Hautgesundheit5%

“löst sich sehr schnell von der Haut ab”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Leider Geld für Müll bezahlt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Fragliche Anwendung”

Empfindlichkeit insgesamt3%

“Sensitive sieht anders aus”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt2%

“Verletzungen”

Haltbarkeit2%

“löst sich immer wieder ab”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Teurer Müll”

Top return reasons

Defekt Material/Teile100%