Skip to content
40

ovulationstest 10 miu

Skip it

Soft demand (-39.1% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 6Growth 5Conversion 83Competition 34Returns 99Price range 24Avg price 27Brand share 30Review moat 23Quality gap 81

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great8.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay€9.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad€5.21–€18.17

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Bad7,900.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€22K

€22K/yr · 27K searches

Growth

Bad-39.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

14

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

13%

  • Z1 Pharma36%
  • One Step14%
  • Easy@Home13%
  • femometer10%
  • Yagaspantery7%
  • Wondfo7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€2K20%€4K30%€7K40%€9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -39.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Genauigkeit insgesamt19%

“Richtig ablesen können hilft: Super Test”

Fruchtbarkeit/Empfängnis17%

“Kinderwunsch super Produkt”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Super Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Easy@home”

Effizienz5%

“Funktioniert”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Test macht was er soll”

Sichtweite4%

“sehr deutlich zusehen”

Design insgesamt2%

“Super Erfindung”

Empfindlichkeit insgesamt1%

“Reagieren sehr sensibel, sind für mich die besten in günstigen Testsegment”

What buyers complain about

Genauigkeit insgesamt32%

“Ungenau”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Einfach Müll”

Funktionalität insgesamt10%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit10%

“Falsch negativ, trotz LH-Peak bei anderen Tests”

Farbe9%

“Wenig Farbe”

Dicke4%

“der Strich war sehr dünn.”

Sichtweite4%

“Scheint weniger sensibel zu sein”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Unbrauchbar”

Alterseignung2%

“Nichts für Frühtester”

Haltbarkeit1%

“Sonst wird es halt nichts”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt33%
Genauigkeit insgesamt11%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%
Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit7%
Gesamtgröße6%
Farbe5%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Heizung2%