Skip to content
54

olivenblattextrakt

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but soft demand (-15.0% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 20Growth 17Conversion 87Competition 32Returns 99Price range 84Avg price 95Brand share 61Review moat 89Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€26.57

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great225.69

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Great9.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€10.74–€108.77

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad€81K

€81K/yr · 31K searches

Growth

Bad-15.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

15

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

26%

  • Vit4ever25%
  • Native Vital17%
  • Vegavero10%
  • SinoPlaSan GmbH9%
  • QIDOSHA8%
  • CDF Sports & Health Solutions6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€8K20%€16K30%€24K40%€32K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -15.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K750Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt40%

“Super Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%

“Macht was es soll”

Dosierung8%

“Flüssig und gut dosierbar”

Blutdruck6%

“Senkt wirklich den Blutdruck”

Gelenkschmerzen6%

“Super gegen Gelenk schmerzen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Hilft schon nach kurzer Anwendung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Super Preis/Leistung”

Nebenwirkungen4%

“Ich bin zufrieden mit der Wirkung”

Fieberlinderung3%

“Toll auch bei Infekten”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Doch ich denke, dass es gut für die Gesundheit ist”

What buyers complain about

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt21%

“Leider hat diese Marke die neuen Produkte oft mit ungünstigen Inhaltsstoffen versehen”

Zertifizierungen14%

“Das ist natürlich keine medizinische Empfehlung”

Blutdruck14%

“Der Blutdruck (diast.) ist etwas niedriger geworden, so wollte ich das auch.”

Geruch14%

“Stinken fürchterlich nach Chemie”

Süße14%

“Es schmeckt zwar süßer als erwartet,”

Funktionalität insgesamt7%

“Kann keine Wirkung feststellen”

Dosierung7%

“Kurzfristige Einnahme bringt nicht den Erfolg”