Skip to content
50

nassrasierer herren intimbereich

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.2%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 94% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 42Conversion 69Competition 54Returns 91Price range 73Avg price 67Brand share 14Review moat 23Quality gap 75

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good€6.44–€38.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good€14.00

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good53%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+13.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad7,698.58

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€76K

€76K/yr · 86K searches

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 53% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

72

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

4%

  • by Amazon82%
  • Wilkinson Sword5%
  • Wahl3%
  • BIC3%
  • Gillette2%
  • PHILIPS1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€3K8%€6K12%€9K16%€12K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +13.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Overall, a high-quality product that fully lives up to the Gillette name”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Bestes preisleistungsverhältnis”

Schneiden/Trimmen17%

“⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Excellent Shave Quality / Hervorragende Rasierqualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Produkt Information”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Top einfache Handhabung”

Akkulaufzeit4%

“Top Qualität und super lange Leistung des Akkus”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Schärfe2%

“Guter rasier”

Haltbarkeit2%

“The replacement blades also last a long time”

Griff2%

“liegt angenehm in der Hand”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Das Problem: Präzision vs. Performance”

Schneiden/Trimmen10%

“Rasieren unmöglich”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Erstzteile teuer”

Produktzustand7%

“Gebrauchtes Produkt erhalten”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Defekt nach 10-15 fachiger Nutzung”

Schärfe6%

“Rasierklingen halt”

Aufladen6%

“Nach 8 Monaten erst die zweite Akkuladung”

Akkulaufzeit5%

“Akku hält nicht lang”

Allergien4%

“ich neige nur bei einer Glattrasur immer zu Irritationen,”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Irreführende Kompatibilität”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt22%
Produktzustand14%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Aufladen8%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Gesamtgröße8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%
schädigen/verbrennen Haare2%
Add-Ons/Anhänge2%
Stärke2%