Skip to content
51

myprotein creatine monohydrate

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a deep review moat (8,142 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 41Conversion 50Competition 48Returns 100Price range 62Avg price 79Brand share 55Review moat 23Quality gap 53

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€16.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€5.53–€30.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+12.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay€104K

€104K/yr · 157K searches

Review moat

Bad8,142.36

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

71

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

22%

  • Optimum Nutrition37%
  • Gym Nutrition12%
  • natural elements9%
  • ESN7%
  • ProFuel7%
  • KATIVA6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€5K10%€10K15%€16K20%€21K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 53 weeks — +12.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KPrime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt22%

“A good Produkte”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Good price, works well”

Löslichkeit9%

“sich easy in den Shake mischen.”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Macht seinen Job”

Geschmack5%

“Geschmack neutral”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Best erforschtes Supplement”

Dosierung3%

“Rein, leicht zu dosieren, ideal für den Muskelaufbau”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Easy”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Top Produkt”

Energieniveau3%

“I feel more energetic”

What buyers complain about

Geruch10%

“Stinkt”

Geschmack insgesamt7%

“Es hat allerdings einen bitteren Nachgeschmack”

Löslichkeit7%

“Löst sich nicht wirklich gut auf”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Sehr gross”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“nicht ganz optimal”

Dosierung5%

“Dosierlöffel fehlt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Irreführend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Money for nothing”

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken4%

“Form schlecht schluckbar”

Geschmack4%

“Geschmacklich nicht ganz neutral”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt24%
Qualität insgesamt11%
Geruch10%
Feucht/Trocken10%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%
Eignung Glattes Haar5%
Sprachprobleme5%
schädigen/verbrennen Haare5%
Gesamtgröße5%
Produktzustand5%