Skip to content
58

moorkissen

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($21.41 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 57Growth 3Conversion 63Competition 60Returns 81Price range 78Avg price 91Brand share 73Review moat 76Quality gap 57

Avg price

Great€21.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€7.13–€44.61

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great489.52

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good5.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good€434K

€434K/yr · 365K searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-43.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 falling

Sellers

19

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

31%

  • Tampen17%
  • WASSERFELD15%
  • DORNBACH11%
  • axion9%
  • Original Moorwichtel9%
  • Sport-Tec8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€22K10%€43K15%€65K20%€87K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -43.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Wärme15%

“Wärme”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Optisch ist es genau wie auf den Fotos”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Passt”

Heizer7%

“Angenehme Wärme”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“einfache Handhabung”

Kissen4%

“An sich ist das Kissen super zu handhaben”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“angenehm zu Handhaben,”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“bester Preis für den Doppelpack”

Temperaturerhaltung3%

“Angenehme Wärme, die sehr wohltuend ist”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit17%

“Schnell defekt”

Heizung14%

“Speichert keine Wärme”

Geruch7%

“unangenehmer Plastikgeruch”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Müll”

Gesamtgröße5%

“ein bisschen klein”

Auslaufsicher5%

“Undicht”

Materialqualität4%

“Material defekt, kleine Löcher, Inhalt tritt aus”

Kissen3%

“Moorkissen war bei Lieferung defekt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Marketing”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“es ist ein bisschen umständlich”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße29%
Auslaufsicher12%
Heizung12%
Geruch9%
Wärme5%
Gewicht schwer5%
Kissen5%
Haltbarkeit4%
Materialqualität3%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%