Skip to content
56

metacam für hunde

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 89Growth 23Conversion 88Competition 36Returns 100Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 64Quality gap 21

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€32.90

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Great€1.6M

€1.6M/yr · 483K searches

Price range

Great€10.82–€70.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great10.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good954.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay63%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-3.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 63% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

4 rising

Sellers

24

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Traumeel80%
  • Zeel17%
  • Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH2%
  • NATUREFLOW2%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€164K20%€329K30%€493K40%€658K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
12K8KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt30%

“Super Produkt”

Haustierfreundlich20%

“Hund war auch viel vitaler”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis Leistung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Tabletten sind schmackhaft”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Gut verträglich und wirken”

Beruhigend/Zahnen4%

“Es hilft ein wenig die Gelenkschmerzen zu lindern”

Gelenkschmerzen2%

“Zell für Hunde bei altersbedingten Gelenkschmerzen wie zum Beispiel Arthose”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Einfache Anwendung”

Ernährungs Gehalt2%

“inzwischen auch das Kollagen mithilft.”

What buyers complain about

Benutzerfreundlichkeit22%

“Aufstehen ist ihr sehr schwer gefallen”

Geruch22%

“Sie riechen leicht fischig”

Verdauungsstörungen20%

“bekam er Durchfall.”

Geschmack11%

“Der Geschmack ist nicht ganz so ihrer, muss im Nassfutter versteckt werden”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt11%

“Tabletten für die Tierwelt”

Allergien4%

“Mein Malteser reagiert mit Erbrechen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Leider 3x so teuer”

Top return reasons

Produktzustand100%