Skip to content
60

magnesium flüssig

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 18Growth 41Conversion 73Competition 64Returns 99Price range 75Avg price 80Brand share 72Review moat 82Quality gap 57

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great359.25

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great€17.19

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€7.40–€38.53

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+12.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€72K

€72K/yr · 62K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

49

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

31%

  • Best Body Nutrition20%
  • Energybody15%
  • Powerbar11%
  • inkospor9%
  • Doppelherz7%
  • SINOVATI7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€4K10%€7K15%€11K20%€14K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +12.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Super Produkt”

Geschmack insgesamt11%

“Schmeckt wunderbar”

Magnesium10%

“Das in diesem Produkt enthaltene Magnesiumcitrat wird schneller vom Körper aufgenommen als andere Magnesiumpräparate”

Griff9%

“Bester Gripp”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Schnell, praktisch gut”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preisleistung super”

Feucht/Trocken4%

“Trocknet schnell ab”

Geschmack4%

“Geschmackvoll”

Dosierung3%

“Sehr Sparsam gut dosierbar”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“teuer”

Dosierung10%

“Irreführende Dosierungsanleitung”

Geschmack insgesamt9%

“Schmeckt nicht gut”

Geschmack6%

“Keine Wirkung und muffiger Geschmack”

Magnesium5%

“Kein reines Magnesium Bisglynicat”

Feucht/Trocken4%

“Beim Öffnen bröselt all das getrocknete heraus”

Haltbarkeit3%

“War quasi direkt kaputt trotz Ordnungsgemäßer nutzung”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Müll”

Geruch3%

“Übler Geschmack und Geruch”

Genauigkeit insgesamt2%

“Nicht überzeugend”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt17%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit8%
Gesamtgröße8%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Übung/Sporteignung7%
Stärke6%
Geruch6%
Abdeckung Qualität6%
Feucht/Trocken6%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%