Skip to content
50

müllbeutel 60l

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (20.5% search→purchase), but soft demand (-6.9% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 22Conversion 100Competition 22Returns 99Price range 58Avg price 41Brand share 30Review moat 49Quality gap 47

Conversion

Incredible20.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Good€465K

€465K/yr · 207K searches

Price range

Good€0.60–€34.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay1,596.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay€10.95

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-6.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

58

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

9%

  • by Amazon33%
  • Swirl31%
  • ja!11%
  • The Sustainable People6%
  • Toneco5%
  • Ulith4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€46K20%€93K30%€139K40%€186K1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -6.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt22%

“Super Qualität”

Stärke17%

“Das Material wirkt robust”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Preis-Leistung okay,”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Passt”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Sehr gutes Produkt, reißfest und stabil”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Einfache Müllbeutel”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält was versprochen wird”

Auslaufsicher2%

“Sehr gute Müllbeutel, blickdicht und reißfest”

Dicke1%

“Sehr dick”

Umweltfreundlichkeit1%

“Diese biomüllbeutel sind zwar angegeben dass sie abbaubar sind”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Unzureichend”

Dicke8%

“Ziemlich dünnes material”

Stärke8%

“sehr dünn”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Zugband und Beutel reißen bei normaler Nutzung”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Müllbeuter gross”

Materialqualität5%

“Das Material ist recht dünn”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Unmöglich nie wieder”

Dünn4%

“Etwas dünn”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Etwas teurer als No-Name Müllbeutel”

Sichtweite2%

“undurchsichtig und undurchlässig habe ich mir die Müllsäcke gekauft.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße50%
Dünn18%
Stärke6%
Haltbarkeit5%
Geruch4%
Flexibilität3%
Dicke3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Farbe3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%