Skip to content
54

müllbeutel 30l

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (17.3% search→purchase), but soft demand (-10.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 20Conversion 98Competition 49Returns 98Price range 49Avg price 45Brand share 65Review moat 39Quality gap 68

Conversion

Incredible17.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay€0.55–€28.83

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay€11.45

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,614.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€110K

€110K/yr · 56K searches

Growth

Bad-10.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

20 rising

Sellers

79

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

28%

  • ja!18%
  • Swirl14%
  • Relevo14%
  • by Amazon13%
  • Profissimo7%
  • Gut & Günstig6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€6K10%€11K15%€17K20%€22K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -10.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KPrime Day '24Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis20%

“Preis Leistung optimal”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Super Qualität”

Stärke13%

“Stabil”

Gesamtgröße11%

“Passt”

Geruch10%

“Riecht super”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Reißfeste, robuste Müllbeutel”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Macht was es soll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Leichte Handhabung”

Dicke2%

“Hauchdünn - Gefühlsecht”

Wasserbeständigkeit1%

“das Müllbeutel ist fast wasserdicht”

What buyers complain about

Dicke17%

“Dünnes Material”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Mülltüten”

Haltbarkeit11%

“immer wieder mal reißt das Zugband.”

Stärke10%

“dünnhäutig”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Passt nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Teurer als Discounterware”

Dünn4%

“Viel zu dünn”

Materialqualität3%

“Dünnes Material”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Beutel kann nicht vollständig geöffnet und nicht vollständig verschlossen werden”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung1%

“Lieferanweisungen nicht eingehalten”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße59%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Dünn6%
Materialqualität5%
Stärke4%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Geruch2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
Dicke1%