Skip to content
59

mückenschutz kinder

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +651.6% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 57Growth 100Conversion 94Competition 18Returns 100Price range 0Avg price 20Brand share 37Review moat 35Quality gap 70

Growth

Incredible+651.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€447K

€447K/yr · 519K searches

Brand share

Okay83%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay3,005.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Bad€7.26

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Bad79%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Price range

Bad€4.38–€10.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 79% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

67

Top-5 brand share

83%

Open market

14%

  • MOSKINTO58%
  • ShadowRealmTech10%
  • Novokill6%
  • pieksmichnicht5%
  • CHALLEY-YOKI4%
  • TOREDOO3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%€67K30%€134K45%€201K60%€268K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 12 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +651.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 47.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Linderung von Juckreiz13%

“Gut, lindert juckreiz”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit11%

“Sehr praktisch und handlich das Gel als Roll-On zu haben”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung8%

“Machen Mückenstiche erträglicher”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Super Produkt”

Effizienz6%

“Funktioniert”

Portabilität6%

“Handlicher Roller”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält was es verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Sein geld wert”

Allergien4%

“Gut beim Juckreiz”

Geruch4%

“Es ist geruchslos”

What buyers complain about

Allergien18%

“geleitet als Juckreiz”

Funktionalität insgesamt10%

“funktioniert null”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Sehr schade, 10€ für nichts”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Kleine Patches”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung7%

“Insekten”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%

“Kaum aufgeklebt”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%

“Was fehlt: Dimetindenmaleat, also ein”

Linderung von Juckreiz4%

“Es wird weder eine kühlende Wirkung verspürt, noch lindert es den Juckreiz”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Qualität hat nachgelassen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“die Beschreibung verwirrt.”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt22%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung11%
Gesamtgröße11%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit10%
Geruch8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Alterseignung4%
Linderung von Juckreiz4%
Genauigkeit insgesamt4%