Skip to content
44

lumify

Skip it

Soft demand (-14.7% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 21Growth 18Conversion 64Competition 23Returns 99Price range 87Avg price 86Brand share 19Review moat 56Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€5.86–€94.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€19.35

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,255.29

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad73%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad€85K

€85K/yr · 77K searches

Brand share

Bad92%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-14.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 73% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9 flat

Sellers

63

Top-5 brand share

92%

Open market

5%

  • Visine47%
  • Dr.Theiss19%
  • Bausch + Lomb13%
  • Johnson & Johnson9%
  • INNOXA Laboratoires4%
  • HYLO EYE CARE3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 5%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€4K10%€9K15%€13K20%€17K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 19 weeks — -14.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KMar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Effizienz17%

“Klappt bestens”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Top Produkt”

Augenhygiene14%

“Ideal für meine empfindliche Augen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit11%

“Richtige Handhabung”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Gute Verträglichkeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Preis-Leistungsverhältnis stimmt”

Komfort insgesamt4%

“wirken sie angenehm beruhigend”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“Helfen sofort, die Augen sind umgehend wieder befeuchtet”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Frische3%

“Augen sehen frischer aus 💫 Prima ~ die Augen sehen nach der Anwendung- viel Frischer - heller aus ~ Super”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“Geldverschwendung”

Funktionalität insgesamt13%

“Wirkt überhaupt nicht”

Allergien8%

“Ich bin Allergikerin und meine Augen sind oft gerötet und gereizt”

Dosierung8%

“Dosierung sehr schwierig – Fläschchen muss optimiert werden”

Farbe7%

“Das Blaue stört auch”

Dicke5%

“Zu dickflüssig”

Empfindlichkeit insgesamt5%

“Brennt in den Augen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“zu schwierig zu drücken”

Produktzustand5%

“keine neuwertige Ware”

Design insgesamt3%

“Fail by design”

Top return reasons

Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt50%
Funktionalität insgesamt50%