Skip to content
57

level up

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 20Conversion 20Competition 88Returns 100Price range 83Avg price 95Brand share 41Review moat 85Quality gap 79

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€24.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great27%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great295.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great€2.88–€82.11

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay80%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay€107K

€107K/yr · 272K searches

Growth

Bad-9.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (27% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

18 rising

Sellers

51

Top-5 brand share

80%

Open market

16%

  • GAMERS ONLY24%
  • LOOT23%
  • Up-Grade Energy Booster19%
  • natural elements10%
  • GAME ATTACK4%
  • Holy Energy3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (12 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€2K4%€4K6%€6K8%€9K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 63 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 19 weeks — -9.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt41%

“tasty”

Geschmack13%

“Super Geschmack”

Energieniveau7%

“Energy”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Obviously, this is something to expect from the cheapest offer out there”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Super Produkt”

Süße4%

“und das bei Null Zucker”

Löslichkeit2%

“Löst sich perfekt auf”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Erfüllt seinen Zweck”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Fitter”

Koffeingehalt1%

“das Koffein wirkt einwandfrei.”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt29%

“Schmeckt absolut nicht”

Geschmack13%

“Geschmack gewöhnungsbedürftig”

Künstliche Süßstoffe7%

“Was ist bitteschön Acesulfam K als Süßungsmittel?? JUNK, JUNK, JUNK!!!”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Komplettes geld in Ausfluss”

Süße4%

“Anfangs lecker, auf Dauer etwas zu süß”

Geruch2%

“jede Sorte riecht”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Bringt absolut gar nichts”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Da gibt es deutlich bessere Produkte”

Abgestanden/verfault/verwöhnt1%

“Eckelhaft”

Ernährungs Gehalt1%

“Not a very healthy mix”