Skip to content
58

kreatin für frauen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 22Growth 44Conversion 52Competition 76Returns 100Price range 88Avg price 95Brand share 31Review moat 52Quality gap 65

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€25.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€7.53–€100.65

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good4.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,437.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Okay+14.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€88K

€88K/yr · 80K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

29

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

12%

  • XbyX75%
  • natural elements4%
  • ProFuel3%
  • Aenders2%
  • BANDINI2%
  • NATURTREU2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€3K6%€5K9%€8K12%€11K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 10 weeks — +14.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '26May '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Alles bestens, super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Bestes Preis-Leistungsverhältnis”

Löslichkeit9%

“Mixe es auch in Quark, Joghurt oder in Smoothies”

Geschmack insgesamt8%

“Schmeckt super”

Geschmack6%

“Geschmack neutral”

Ernährungs Gehalt5%

“Bestes Proteinpulver”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Macht seinen Job”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt4%

“Top Produkt”

Energieniveau3%

“Mehr Power im Alltag”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Super easy”

What buyers complain about

Geschmack insgesamt10%

“Leider schmeckt der Shake sandig”

Löslichkeit7%

“Löst sich schlecht auf, Klumpen”

Geruch7%

“stinkt”

Geschmack5%

“geschmacklich natürlich bitter”

Dosierung4%

“Dosierlöffel fehlt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Money for nothing”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“nicht ganz optimal”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Irreführend”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Sehr gross”

Einfaches Kauen/Schlucken3%

“Form schlecht schluckbar”

Top return reasons

Auslaufsicher44%
Geschmack insgesamt10%
Produktzustand7%
Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt7%
Kontamination5%
Feucht/Trocken3%
Geschmack3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Schlafqualität2%