Skip to content
60

kontaktlinsen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 67Growth 28Conversion 33Competition 78Returns 99Price range 71Avg price 90Brand share 22Review moat 65Quality gap 73

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€21.18

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good€5.33–€38.80

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€667K

€667K/yr · 1.2M searches

Review moat

Good905.19

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay2.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+2.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

4%

  • Air Optix44%
  • Soflens14%
  • DAILIES AquaComfort Plus14%
  • Biofinity10%
  • Acuvue8%
  • EYE CARE COMPANY4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€20K6%€40K9%€60K12%€80K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 59 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +2.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Linsen28%

“Beste Kontaktlinsen”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Beste Qualität”

Komfort insgesamt14%

“Super komfortabel”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Super Preis/Leistung”

Augenhygiene6%

“meine Augen sind, nach Regenerationszeit, wieder fit.”

Gesamtgröße3%

“perfekt pasend sehr angenehm”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Gute Reinigung”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Gut in der Anwendung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Macht was es soll”

Feucht/Trocken2%

“Top feuchtes Mittel”

What buyers complain about

Linsen20%

“Eine Linse war defekt”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Sehr schlechte Qualität”

Sichtweite6%

“Linsen blind”

Allergien5%

“Sie hat das Auge stark gereizt”

Komfort insgesamt5%

“Kein guter Tragekomfort”

Feucht/Trocken5%

“wechsel sie erst wenn ich merke, dass es sich langsam etwas trockener anfühlt beim Tragen, was meist nach 2 Monaten der Fall ist.”

Gesamtgröße4%

“sie sitzen nicht optimal.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Aber diese hier: Unmöglich”

Dosierung3%

“ich bin zu dusselig und drauf reingefallen, normalerweise haben diese Flaschen einen Inhalt von 360ml, hier ist der Inhalt lediglich 250 ml.”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Nicht empfehlenswert sie haften nicht richtig”

Top return reasons

Linsen48%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%
Gesamtgröße8%
Komfort insgesamt4%
Auslaufsicher3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Schmerzlinderung – insgesamt3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
Feucht/Trocken2%
Sichtweite2%