Skip to content
54

ketoxplode gummibärchen zum abnehmen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a small market ($24K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 6Growth 23Conversion 26Competition 64Returns 100Price range 66Avg price 91Brand share 71Review moat 67Quality gap 93

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€21.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good824.81

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€1.90–€39.92

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay2.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-4.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€24K

€24K/yr · 54K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

20 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

32%

  • WeightWorld21%
  • Bears with Benefits13%
  • Keka Naturals13%
  • MayProducts8%
  • KETOXPLODE7%
  • Onznoz6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€9708%€2K12%€3K16%€4K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt25%

“Schmeckt super”

Schlafqualität9%

“Melatonin sorgt für einen besseren Schlaf”

Geschmack9%

“Super Geschmack”

Süße5%

“BeautySweeties Zuckerfreie Häschen”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Super Produkt”

Energieniveau3%

“Sehr guter Energie Booster”

Ernährungs Gehalt3%

“Perfekt für alle, die Low Carb leben”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt2%

“Die weiche Textur und gute Konsistenz machen es einfach einzunehmen, wie ein Gummibärchen”

Gewichtsverlust2%

“Wirksame Unterstützung beim Abnehmen”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“alles ist easy”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis16%

“Ekelhaft und Überteuert”

Geschmack insgesamt10%

“Nachgeschmack”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Wirkungslos”

Geschmack5%

“Geschmack: fruchtig, Wirkung bis jetzt null”

Süße4%

“wenig Zucker”

Gewichtsverlust3%

“Keine absolute Lösung, fürs Abnehmen”

Künstliche Süßstoffe3%

“Süssungsmittel ist Stevia”

Verdauungsstörungen3%

“Durchfall inklusive”

Geruch2%

“Allerdings fehlt mir bei einigen Sorten das Aroma”

Hartes Gefühl2%

“Die Gummies sind relativ hart”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt50%
Künstliche Süßstoffe50%