Skip to content
71

kühlpack zum knicken

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 52Growth 97Conversion 81Competition 31Returns 98Price range 62Avg price 65Brand share 90Review moat 55Quality gap 78

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+169.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Great45%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Conversion

Great8.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€13.84

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€5.67–€30.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,315

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€313K

€313K/yr · 264K searches

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

13

Top-5 brand share

45%

Open market

15%

  • --40%
  • ARNOMED16%
  • General Medi11%
  • HONYAO7%
  • ICEHOF6%
  • PURAHELP6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€31K20%€63K30%€94K40%€125K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +169.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Portabilität19%

“Brauchbar”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit16%

“Einfache Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Erfüllt seinen zweck”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Top Produkt”

Kältelinderung6%

“Kältekompresse”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Guter Service, Preis super”

Temperaturerhaltung4%

“Hielt an die 30 Minuten spürbar kühl”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Ware passt”

Wärme3%

“Ca 30 Minuten spürbar kalt-kühl”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert,”

What buyers complain about

Heizung26%

“Danach wird die Kompresse warm”

Gesamtgröße9%

“Sind klein”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“recht teuer”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Qualität ungenügend, defekt”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Hält nicht lange”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Schwer zu aktivieren”

Temperaturerhaltung5%

“hält keine 10 min kühl - von kalt will ich gar nicht reden”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Aktivierung kaum möglich”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Produkt entspricht nicht der Abbildung”

Geruch2%

“jedoch bekommt man leichte Kopfschmerzen durch den Geruch, vor allem wenn man sie länger trägt.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße36%
Funktionalität insgesamt23%
Heizung6%
Gewicht schwer5%
Auslaufsicher4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Produktzustand2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
Alterseignung2%