Skip to content
54

kühlakku klein

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +565.6% this quarter, but prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($5.64–$14.33) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 7Growth 100Conversion 57Competition 39Returns 98Price range 0Avg price 30Brand share 58Review moat 61Quality gap 62

Growth

Incredible+565.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,049.79

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good4.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Okay€9.57

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad€29K

€29K/yr · 62K searches

Price range

Bad€5.64–€14.33

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

20

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

24%

  • ToCi32%
  • VonBueren16%
  • Comfytemp9%
  • Anstore8%
  • YEAMLTE6%
  • BOOSHMall6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€3K20%€6K30%€9K40%€11K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +565.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
12K8KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 14.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße16%

“Richtige Grösse”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“Handlich”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Produkt ist wie beschrieben”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Leistung”

Wärme4%

“Nur relativ schnell warm”

Temperaturerhaltung4%

“Lange kühl”

Stärke3%

“Solides Produkt”

Speicherkapazität3%

“Echt mega”

Flexibilität3%

“Flexible Kühlpacks”

Mundhygiene3%

“Ideal bei Zahnschmerzen”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße31%

“Kleiner als angegeben”

Temperaturerhaltung13%

“Leider werden diese recht schnell warm aufgrund der kleinen Größe”

Auslaufsicher9%

“Schlechter Schraubverschluss und daher undicht”

Wasserbeständigkeit9%

“schließt dann nicht wasserdicht, obwohl man die Dinger mit Wasser befüllen soll.”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“sieht auf dem Foto nicht so aus”

Heizung6%

“Leider hält dieses Kühlpad nur wenige Minuten”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“schwer zu öffnen”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Schrott”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung3%

“Keine Anleitung dabei”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße64%
Auslaufsicher8%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Feucht/Trocken2%
Haltbarkeit2%
Dünn2%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%