Skip to content
53

joghurtkulturen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but soft demand (-25.2% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 30Growth 12Conversion 77Competition 46Returns 100Price range 55Avg price 54Brand share 56Review moat 66Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great7.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good871.48

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good€5.63–€26.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good€12.43

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€137K

€137K/yr · 147K searches

Growth

Bad-25.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

23

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

23%

  • My.Yo22%
  • Natural Probiotic Selection18%
  • Coolinario13%
  • Reformhaus10%
  • Yogourmet9%
  • Lavita6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€7K10%€14K15%€21K20%€27K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -25.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geschmack insgesamt31%

“Mega Lecker”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Good product”

Geschmack10%

“Super Geschmack, schön mild”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Alles bestens,genau wie beschrieben”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt5%

“Konsistenz”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Vegan/Biologisch3%

“Bio Joghurtferment”

Weiches Gefühl2%

“Sehr cremig und mild”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert”

Sauer2%

“säuerlich, stichfest, lecker”

What buyers complain about

Sauer22%

“wird schnell sauer”

Funktionalität insgesamt18%

“funktioniert nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Schade für das Geld”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Daher kann ich zur Qualität des Joghurts nicht sagen”

Verdünnt/wässrig5%

“Zu flüssig”

Geschmack insgesamt4%

“Schmeckt nicht wirklich gut”

Dicke3%

“Dünner Schleim”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt3%

“nicht mild, sondern säuerlich”

Geschmack2%

“So wenig Geschmack”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Verpackung also irreführend”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt50%
Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt33%
Vegan/Biologisch17%