Skip to content
51

hygienebeutel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but soft demand (-1.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 29Growth 24Conversion 93Competition 49Returns 99Price range 41Avg price 30Brand share 59Review moat 77Quality gap 35

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Great465.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay€3.03–€23.21

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay€9.55

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Okay€129K

€129K/yr · 118K searches

Growth

Bad-1.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

25%

  • DEISS23%
  • Medi-Inn+18%
  • Tiga-Med13%
  • Fab Little Bag8%
  • Hypafol7%
  • THERACASO5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€13K20%€26K30%€39K40%€52K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße18%

“passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit15%

“praktisch,gut”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Preis-Leistung total in Ordnung”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Sehr gutes Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Tut was es soll”

Haltbarkeit9%

“Stabil und reißfest”

Einfache Reinigung6%

“Saubere Sache”

Umweltfreundlichkeit4%

“Umweltbewußte Variante”

Kompaktheit4%

“Klein und kompakt”

Stärke2%

“Stabil und reißfest”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße31%

“Beutel sind viel kleiner”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Wirkt sehr billig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Eine Geldverschwendung”

Materialqualität6%

“Behälter leider aus Kunststoff”

Stärke6%

“Oft sind Hygienebeutel viel zu dünn”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Artikel Beschreibung ist ein Fake”

Geruch6%

“Von Geruch - und Feuchtigkeitsdicht, kann keine Rede sein”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße82%
Farbe3%
Geruch3%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Gewicht schwer2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%